Despite Allegations, No Evidence of Trump–Russia Collusion Found (Part II)

(from No.588 C5)
Before Trump was inaugurated, officials with the Obama administration made a concerted effort to spread intelligence information on the Trump team across the government, according to Evelyn Farkas, former deputy assistant secretary of defense under President Obama, speaking on MSNBC on March 28.
Trump has repeatedly called for the leakers to be caught. There are several federal laws prohibiting the leaking of classified information, with violators facing years in prison.

Retired Gen. Michael Flynn

Michael Flynn had served 30 years in the military before being appointed by then-President Obama as director of the Defense Intelligence Agency—a position he was fired from in 2014.
Flynn, an early supporter of Trump, was appointed as national security adviser. The retired general was then forced to resign on Feb. 13 after he had misinformed Vice President Mike Pence about a phone call he had with the Russian ambassador in December.
Acting Attorney General Sally Yates testified on March 8 before a Senate Judiciary subcommittee that she had warned the White House that Flynn had not been truthful, based on an FBI investigation.
Flynn apparently misled Pentagon investigators about his foreign connections when he sought to renew his security clearance in early 2016, according to a document obtained by congressional Democrats and released in part.
Flynn has declined to comply with a subpoena from the Senate Intelligence Committee as it investigates possible Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. election, invoking his Fifth Amendment constitutional protection against self-incrimination.

Republicans Pulling Away

Since the Comey firing, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has declared that President Trump’s priorities “are not necessarily ours,” according to Bloomberg.
McConnell has said any tax reform must be revenue neutral, while Trump wants big tax cuts that will spur economic growth but may not immediately pay for themselves. And McConnell is opposed to Trump’s plan to slash the State Department budget.
McConnell has said he would not support a big infrastructure plan or fight for a border wall.
Taken together, McConnell has set himself against major issues—bold tax reform, a smaller federal government, a major infrastructure initiative, and a border wall—that Trump campaigned on.
Bloomberg quotes several senators and representatives who are tired of the drama of the Trump White House and are less supportive of Trump.
This pulling away of Republicans in Congress from Trump aligns with the Democratic strategy articulated by Rep. Jerrold Nadler, which urged Democrats to attack Trump in hopes of causing electorally vulnerable Republicans to waver, thus denying Trump the ability to enact his agenda.

Deep State

The “deep state” is the permanent government of the United States—unelected officials with broad powers, who don’t have to worry about political terms. These include State Department officials, Justice Department officials, and members of the intelligence and federal law enforcement agencies.
“What this president has done—his first 100-plus days, even before he came into office—is pick fights with the intelligence community and now the law enforcement community. … So we know that they talk about the deep state; well, these are communities that have a lot of loyalty within, and know how to get back, even if you’re the president of the United States,” said CNN reporter Dana Bash on May 16.

Media Bias

Two studies done of the news coverage of President Trump’s first 100 days in office have, using different methodologies, reached similar conclusions. The press has been unprecedentedly negative in reporting on Trump and his administration.
A study by Harvard’s Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics, and Public Policy analyzed “news reports in the print editions of The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, and The Washington Post, the main newscasts of CBS, CNN, Fox News, and NBC, and three European news outlets (The UK’s Financial Times and BBC, and Germany’s ARD).”
The Shorenstein Center found that 80 percent of the coverage of Trump was negative. The coverage of presidents Bill Clinton, George W. Bush, and Barack Obama in their first 100 days was, respectively, 60, 57, and 41 percent negative.
“Trump’s coverage was unsparing,” The Shorenstein Center reported. “In no week did the coverage drop below 70 percent negative, and it reached 90 percent negative at its peak.” The coverage was very negative across all topics except the economy, where the coverage was only 54 percent negative. CNN and NBC were the most negative American outlets, with coverage that was 93 percent negative.

Why Trump Fired Comey

President Donald Trump and the White House have given multiple accounts of why FBI Director James Comey was fired. News media have emphasized contradictions from one day to the next in the accounts, but have failed to notice the underlying consistency and overlooked what may be Trump’s most important considerations in firing Comey.
In Trump’s May 9 letter to Comey informing him of his termination, Trump stated that Comey was “not able to effectively lead the bureau.” New leadership was needed to restore “public trust and confidence” in the FBI.

The White House released a memo by deputy attorney general Rod Rosenstein that detailed the “serious mistakes” Comey had made. This memo was said by various White House spokespersons to be the reason for Comey’s firing.
In the July 5 press conference Comey held about the FBI’s investigation of Hillary Clinton’s emails, Comey usurped the authority of the attorney general and announced the conclusion of the investigation without the authorization of Justice Department leaders.
Also, by announcing derogatory information about the suspect of a declined criminal investigation, Comey violated Clinton’s rights. Rosenstein said this was a “textbook example of what federal prosecutors and agents are taught not to do.”
Rosenstein also criticized Comey’s announcement on Oct. 28 of the reopening of the investigation into Clinton’s emails. The long-standing policy is to “refrain from publicizing non-public information.”
Rosenstein concluded that the bureau is unlikely to regain public trust until it has a director who understands the gravity of Comey’s mistakes and “pledges never to repeat them.”
On May 10, CNN reported that several unnamed sources inside the White House claimed Trump had made the decision to fire Comey a week earlier.
On May 11, in an interview with NBC, Trump said he was going to fire Comey no matter what Rosenstein’s memo said, contradicting his spokespeople. Trump blamed Comey for exonerating Clinton when she was clearly guilty. Among others, Andrew McCarthy of National Review has pointed out that Clinton’s actions fit those proscribed by the Espionage Act, and that Comey, in his July press conference, had misstated the grounds for guilt under that act.
Trump also told NBC that because of Comey’s actions, the FBI was in turmoil.
Finally, Trump admitted he had considered the relevance of the Russia collusion investigation, but decided that the investigation was not a good reason to refrain from firing Comey. In Trump’s words, “this Russia thing with Trump and Russia is a made-up story.”
On May 19, The New York Times reported, on the basis of an alleged leaked transcript, that Trump said in a May 10 Oval Office meeting with Russian officials: “I just fired the head of the FBI. He was crazy, a real nut job.”
“I faced great pressure because of Russia,” said Trump, as reported by the Times. “That’s taken off.”
The next day, press secretary Sean Spicer released a statement saying, “By grandstanding and politicizing the investigation into Russia’s actions, James Comey created unnecessary pressure on our ability to engage and negotiate with Russia.”
To summarize, Trump and members of his administration have asserted in multiple ways that Comey was incompetent in his handling of the Clinton email investigation; that he acted inappropriately, taking on roles that were not properly his; that his actions brought the FBI into turmoil; and that he showed bad character, as was also evident in his conduct during the Russia investigation.
These accounts reported in the media ignore what Paul Sperry, in an article for the New York Post, called the “straw that broke the camel’s back,” leading to Comey’s firing. Comey failed or was unwilling to investigate the torrent of leaks that are aimed at undermining the Trump administration, and Trump’s concern at Comey’s failure was shared by Republican leaders in Congress, Sperry reported.
Sperry also reported remarks by Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) and Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) confirming that Trump himself was not a target of the ongoing Russia investigation.

Clinton, Podesta Russia Ties

John Podesta, Hillary Clinton’s campaign manager, joined the board of Massachusetts-based energy company Joule Energy in 2011 two months before it received a $35 million investment from Rusnano, a Russian government-owned joint-stock company, according to a 2016 report by the Government Accountability Institute (GAI).
Podesta claimed he disclosed his 75,000 stock shares in the company, and transferred them in 2014 the same month he became counselor under president Barack Obama.
However, according to the GAI report, Podesta’s disclosure “does not cover the years 2011–2012.” It also states that while Podesta is listed on the corporate records, “he failed to disclose his membership on the board of Joule Stichting in his federal financial disclosure forms when he joined the Obama White House as a senior advisor.”
The Podesta Group, co-founded by Podesta, lobbied Washington on behalf of Russia’s largest bank, Sberbank, as exposed by the Panama Papers, a leak of millions of documents on offshore entities. Tony Podesta, brother of John Podesta and chairman of The Podesta Group, is a registered lobbyist for Russia’s Sberbank and was a top campaign bundler and contributor for Clinton’s presidential campaign.
Bill Clinton was paid $500,000 by Russian investment bank Renaissance Capital, owned by Russian billionaire Mikhail Prokhorov, for a speech in 2010. Hillary Clinton disclosed this payment. Around the same time, Renaissance Capital was involved in a deal to obtain Uranium One, a Canada-based uranium company with operations in the United States. The State Department, under Hillary Clinton, signed off on the transfer; at the same time, the Clinton Foundation received payments from the organization. The New York Times reported in April 2015 that “as the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show, a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation.”
According to the report from the GAI, “Nine Uranium One shareholders donated more than $145 million to the Clinton Foundation,” and some of them, including one from Uranium One Chairman Ian Telfer, “had not been disclosed by the Clinton Foundation.”
    来源: 看中国 责编: Kitt

    上一篇: 朝鲜信息封锁失效 金正男遗体成民间热门话题

    下一篇: 寰宇新闻